12.01 + 雲與鐘 + 適度人品有益心靈健康。| 記憶拼圖 - 三十六雨布袋戲同人論壇

三十六雨記憶拼圖 12.01 + 雲與鐘 + 適度人品有益心靈健康。

«
1
2
3
4
5
6
»
Pages: 2/41 Go

復制鏈接 | 瀏覽器收藏

靈山冰映

空想旅團員。

級別: 天使

作者資料
發送短消息
加為好友

UID: 15363
精華: 0
發帖: 929
威望: 6 點
銀兩: 64195 兩
蓮花: 352 朵
本命: 子焉/蒼離
王道: 羽慕/秋紀/箏叉
牆頭: 美人們
配偶: 美人們
座右銘: 觀世無相，雲隱神行。
注冊時間: 2006-07-16
最後登錄: 2024-09-06

鮮花(252)

10樓發表於: 2007-12-05 07:35

只看該作者 | 小中大

媽媽回國了, 有很多怪怪的採購成果, 還有一件浴衣= =|||

是說台灣有什麼場合能穿這樣的衣服呀......@@

帶回一種扇貝做成的鹹零食, 像是辣調味的干貝乾, 很喜歡這個><

海鮮做成的乾我都喜歡~~~

白色戀人也很好吃(笑)

出沒 https://www.plurk.com/scientistr
存文處2https://pixiv.me/scientistr

頂端

餃子

天宇水魔幫參謀<-此餃很純潔

級別: 論壇版主

作者資料
發送短消息
加為好友

UID: 13
精華: 32
發帖: 7795
威望: 399 點
銀兩: 19783 兩
蓮花: 184 朵
本命: 餃子﹐叉子﹐兔子
王道: 秋鳳霞雲箏叉燕靜羅黃
牆頭: 不計其數......
配偶: 嫿嬛
座右銘: 身入無間﹐足踏黃泉
注冊時間: 2004-11-22
最後登錄: 2024-11-25

鮮花(545)

11樓發表於: 2007-12-05 08:07

只看該作者 | 小中大

燻雞名酥~~~好吃哈~~~+___+|||

才四題哈﹐快寫快寫~~催促好友~~XDDD

原來好友喜歡海產﹐我要去告訴魔呱﹐嘿嘿~~

回想起昔日養過的兩隻小雞了。。。唉

天宇特別會塑造那些曾經存在過可是並未出場的人物﹐且都是對出場的人物和情節有巨大影響。所以南風。。。說不定才是最適合叉的人呢。。。嘆息。。。

談文論武道玄機
春夏秋冬一色衣
遨遊江湖千萬里
身藏花名兩卷書
日出日落又一天
攻受道中皆聖賢
修整牆頭爬不盡
太虛渡者算萬年

晉江的窩﹕
http://www.jjwxc.net/oneauthor.php?authorid=310766
圍脖﹕
http://t.sina.com.cn/feifanchen
Lofter:
http://yinwuji.lofter.com

頂端

靈山冰映

空想旅團員。

級別: 天使

作者資料
發送短消息
加為好友

鮮花(252)

12樓發表於: 2007-12-07 19:52

只看該作者 | 小中大

Holder' s 不等式的o上面有兩個點, 這是德文吧= =

下午花了兩小時把全套一般式證完,

我想我這輩子不會忘記它= =

還有可惡的p-norm+_+

然後就去寫我的箏叉100問了XDD

(一樣拖稿~~~~~= =)

最近很喜歡伯藏主, 他的那個詩號據說是織田信長很喜歡的俳句,

信長兄據說常常拿著扇子跳舞吟詩.......

咳咳...這場面好不協調, 想像一個高大英武的男人穿著浴衣袒胸赤足,

然後在那裡慢吞吞揮著扇子, 口唸"人生五十載, 綜觀眾生諸相, 一切恍如夢幻........."

orz

還是伯藏小狐貍可愛些~~~

老大說他很像藏馬...妖狐版本XDD

尤其是半夜出現在鬼們的面前, 很邪門地念"八鬼去其三, 妖地藏......極樂?荒謬, 哈哈哈....."

可憐的鬼, 鬼也怕妖怪啊~~~~~Q_Q

出沒 https://www.plurk.com/scientistr
存文處2https://pixiv.me/scientistr

頂端

燕孤城

級別: 天使

作者資料
發送短消息
加為好友

UID: 161
精華: 0
發帖: 631
威望: 13 點
銀兩: 61179 兩
蓮花: 352 朵
本命:
王道:
牆頭:
配偶:
座右銘:
注冊時間: 2004-12-03
最後登錄: 2024-10-13

鮮花(79)

13樓發表於: 2007-12-10 05:54

只看該作者 | 小中大

嗯~过来恭喜蓝小姐开版，请原谅我这个每周只能上一天36的家伙的迟钝吧XD

另外，您对那两位少爷的观点解开了我这半年来的执念~鞠躬，实在太感激了T_T

最后……很不好意思地问，我要称呼您什么比较好？人际亲疏实在微妙，偏我在这上头就是个糊涂的，还是请主人示下吧~

頂端

靈山冰映

空想旅團員。

級別: 天使

作者資料
發送短消息
加為好友

鮮花(252)

14樓發表於: 2007-12-10 09:11

只看該作者 | 小中大

感謝燕小姐來踩板

一點淺見能夠被人所喜歡我是很開心的~~~

也歡迎來灌水>_<

也同時原諒在下msn上得少, 一個月就幾次而已, 沒什麼機會聊到天(汗)~~~~

稱謂通常我隨意, 寫文章用的名字是司藍, 直稱便可(笑),

又或者叫冰映, 這名字是看了天宇之後才起的, 用來踩踏布布相關的網站^^

也請問燕小姐該如何稱呼^^?

話說網路人際親疏其實很難斷定, 以前我也挺汗的+_+

後來想通了, 網路距離其實並沒有親疏, 就算認定是熟悉了, 現實中見到了面恐怕還是尷尬害羞的(笑),

而在網路上是非親非故的, 也有在現實中見到了發現是熟人的情況...+_+|||

所以自然而然吧~~~XDD

出沒 https://www.plurk.com/scientistr
存文處2https://pixiv.me/scientistr

頂端

靈山冰映

空想旅團員。

級別: 天使

作者資料
發送短消息
加為好友

鮮花(252)

15樓發表於: 2007-12-10 09:15

只看該作者 | 小中大

之前致贈好友W.J. , 信手而作的詩。既已贈他人, 就不再修改。

[弱冠+3]

弱冠之年

始知有先知者

用扭曲的輻射鋼筋、海砂和報廢的汽車殘骸

用高速公路的碎片

用黃昏市場殘破的鯨骨

用爬升著同時失憶的歲月

與凝固的童年

堆積遠古巨人的塑像

攀危樓如履平地者，誰？

二十三公尺高的視野

尚不足看見海天一色的對面

尚不足發現蟻行的生物中間那踩碎的諾言

尚不足仰天觸摸巨人的肩

尚不足以己血肉填充塑像那空洞的眼

尚不足……

人類在死亡的瞬時才明白生命的價值

明白已是雙腳踏上另一個世界

故，生命的意義不作為一種可供傳承的生物價值

生物價值無法作為教科書的內容

於是追尋變成一種人人人迴圈

攀爬巨人大腿一段突出而斑白的斷壁

微笑俯瞰城市黑色的風景

無思想的人們風化的表情

無理智的人們野性化的聲音

先知不過是被踩死而已

在壓倒性的人數面前一句勸言能有多少影響？

文字就如落入流沙緩慢陷落

陷落之前等待踩上沼澤的夥伴

先知心算出太初時候第一枚降雪
心算出太古時候第一對基因
心算出星球交替如何亙古不變
心算出軒轅神話發生的確切時間

有人說億多年後外星生命終於來到這裡

在城市的廢墟中挖出一部報廢的汽車

用電子儀器認定這是此星球上的生命體

他心念自己所做的一切是否有意義

意義卻不是他自己該認定

百年之後誰有他的記憶

記憶是非考據的、非靜止的、非傳承的

比如說下一枚彗星來臨的時機
比如說下一次種族滅絕的地點
比如說下一回金融風暴的預期
比如說下一輪世紀災禍的姿態

有一種紀錄稱為定理他們放在巨人的頭頂

他們不等待被發明他們用以上敘述的存在來證明他們無需被發明

+3
相遇在1984 午後微涼延伸到漫漫長夜

記憶中並沒有那一天的景象

因為妳我的眼都還看不見

背對背在2007

妳毅然接受我逆流而去的野望

南北遠望江漢瀟湘那紛紛錯亂的水

出沒 https://www.plurk.com/scientistr
存文處2https://pixiv.me/scientistr

頂端

靈山冰映

空想旅團員。

級別: 天使

作者資料
發送短消息
加為好友

鮮花(252)

16樓發表於: 2007-12-10 09:32

只看該作者 | 小中大

本部分內容設定了隱藏,需要回復後才能看到

出沒 https://www.plurk.com/scientistr
存文處2https://pixiv.me/scientistr

頂端

靈山冰映

空想旅團員。

級別: 天使

作者資料
發送短消息
加為好友

鮮花(252)

17樓發表於: 2007-12-10 20:48

只看該作者 | 小中大

早上看了Camerer的文章, 真了不起>////<

很喜歡那篇"When does "economic man" dominate social behavior?"

(1)一大群自我考慮(self-regarding我想, 意思就是指經濟學上廣義的自利)的人類追求某目的的行為,

引來其他人類的模仿;

或者(2)一小群other-regarding preferences的人追求某種目的的行為,

獲得其他人類的同意, 即使這樣的行為對大多數人不利。

問題是(1)正確還是(2)正確?

話說神經科學我不熟呀~~~~喵喵orz有些實驗數據實在看不懂= =|||

哪天拖拉著老大去學學大腦構造與刺激行為好了(笑)

Camerer最近的研究重心是"neuroeconomics",以下是他寫的簡單介紹:

What is neuroeconomics?

Neuroeconomics is the use of data on brain processes to suggest new underpinnings for economic theories, which explain how much people save, why there are strikes, why the stock market fluctuates, the nature of consumer confidence and its effect on the economy, and so forth.

Until recently, economists have always been content to treat the human brain as a "black box" and suggest mathematical equations which simplify what the brain is doing. Most empirical studies of economic behavior have therefore relied on measuring inputs, like prices, and predicting outputs, like how much people will buy, from a simplified theory of brain processes. This approach reflects a bias traceable to the 1880’s, when Jevons wrote “I hesitate it is impossible to measure the feelings of the human heart”.

This “rational choice” approach has been enormously successful. But now advances in genetics and brain imaging (and other techniques) have made it possible to observe detailed processes in the brain better than ever before. Brain scanning (ongoing at the new Broad Imaging Center at Caltech) shows which parts of the brain are active when people make economic decisions. This means that we will eventually be able to replace the simple mathematical ideas that have been used in economics with more neurally-detailed descriptions. For example, when economists think about gambling they assume that people combine the chance of winning (probability) with an expectation of how they will value winning and losing (“utilities”). If this theory is correct, neuroeconomics will find two processes in the brain—one for guessing how likely one is to win and lose, and another for evaluating the hedonic pleasure and pain of winning and losing—and another brain region which combines probability and hedonic sensations. More likely, neuroeconomics will show that the desire or aversion to gamble is more complicated than that simple model. Research already shows that pathological gamblers tend to lack a certain gene which limits how much pleasure (in the form of the amount of “dopamine” neurotransmitter that is released when they win) they get from winning. Not getting enough dopamine from everyday pleasures means gamblers need bigger and bigger “fixes” to feel stimulated. In our lab at Caltech, we are also investigating the “fear of the unknown” or “tolerance for ambiguity”—how willing are people to gamble, invest, or take a social risk (like going to a party where they don’t know anybody)? Our hunch is that fear of the unknown is triggered by activity in the “amygdala”, an almond-shaped region (common to most mammals) which is active in registering very rapid sensations of fear, and in both learning and unlearning what to be afraid of. Understanding the neural basis of investing in the face of unknown odds is important for understanding economic phenomena like entrepreneurship, since entrepreneurs start businesses knowing little about their odds—they are economically fearless in a way that most people are not.

Another example is discounting future rewards. The standard theory, which was invented in the 1950s, is that people apply a single declining “discount factor” to future rewards when weighing present rewards against future ones. New theories suggest that there are *two* components to “time discounting”, not one: One component is the steady discounting of future rewards, and the second is a preference for immediate rewards. The second factor can explain why people struggle with temptations and procrastinate. Using fMRI imaging of brain activity when people choose between immediate and future rewards, we will be able to see whether there are two components of time discounting (as the new theories predict) or just one (as the old theories predict). If we find two components, we will know more about the nature of the preference for immediate reward. It may be an emotional desire, or even a physical instinct like grasping for food that is within your reach. The research could yield dramatic insights in helping people resist temptation, saving more and spending less.

A third area we are actively exploring is trust. In a typical “trust game” one person has some money, say $10, which they can invest part of, keeping the rest. The amount they invest is tripled (representing the return to a productive investment, like investing in a factory in a rapidly-growing foreign country). But that tripled amount rests in the hands of a second person, or “trustee”, who is free to repay as much as she likes and keep the rest. To make the game challenging and scientifically interesting, if the second trustee keeps all the money there is nothing the first person can do about it. (Economists call this “weak enforcement of property rights” which is often characteristic of less-developed economies with weaker legal systems.) This game enables us to measure loose concepts like trust and trustworthiness in a crisp numerical way. The amount the first person invests is a measure of how much she expects the trustee to repay her. The amount the trustee repays is a measure of trustworthiness, moral obligation, or reciprocity.

Trust is important in the economy because even large, complex economies rely largely on trust every day. When you deposit a large sum in a bank ATM, or donate money to a charity assuming it will be spent on good causes, or invest in an overseas business partner you barely know, you are trusting that your money will be safe. Studies show that simple measures of trust, like asking people “In general, do you trust people?” are highly correlated with how wealthy a society is. (The poorest countries, like many in Asia and Africa, have very low levels of trust, which reflects and tolerates corruption, prevents investment, and causes the most productive workers to emigrate.) So understanding trust in the brain may enable us to understand economic behavior from synapse to society.

In early fMRI brain scanning, with collaborators at Baylor Medical Center, we have studied what goes on in peoples’ brains when they trust and decide how much to repay. We found a surprising effect of gender. When men decide how much to trust or repay, an area called the “medial cingulate sulcus” is active. This is an area used to process potential reward, and calculate numbers. The male brains are just “doing the math” and turn off after they have made a decision. The female brains are quite different. After women have decided how much to repay, but before they know how their partner reacted to their decision, areas of the brain active in processing potential reward (ventromedial prefrontal cortex and ventral striatum) and in regulating worry and error-detection (caudate nucleus) are active. The women are worrying, and thinking about the reward consequences, after they have decided how much to repay.

The difference in brain activity in the two genders is like the kind of behavior you might see after a couple gets home from a potluck dinner and rehashes the event. The man wants to turn on the TV and catch some sports scores (his medial cingulate is turned off). The woman is more likely to rehash the evening’s events, and worry about whether she said the right thing and whether the hostess was happy with the dish she brought, and whether plans for having lunch later in the week are genuine.

出自http://www.hss.caltech.edu/~camerer/web_material/n.html

出沒 https://www.plurk.com/scientistr
存文處2https://pixiv.me/scientistr

頂端

靈山冰映

空想旅團員。

級別: 天使

作者資料
發送短消息
加為好友

鮮花(252)

18樓發表於: 2007-12-12 02:20

只看該作者 | 小中大

神經經濟學= =

小狐MM, 沒有微積分不見得是好事啊~~~

可能變成隨機圖論, 或者微分幾何(........可憐的受害者|||)

老大很是嚴肅的告訴我:

對自己母親都刻薄的男人, 絕對不能靠近!!

連對媽媽都刻薄了, 對誰還不刻薄?

好吧, 老大你說得對, 孔老夫子真是偉人, 忠與孝,

與其說他是很高的道德標準, 不如說是一種維持社會穩定的戒律吧~~~~

出沒 https://www.plurk.com/scientistr
存文處2https://pixiv.me/scientistr

頂端